Trump's BIGGEST LIE about his Epstein relationship was just exposed in the unredacted Epstein files that Rep. Jamie Raskin just viewed.

After peering behind the curtain, Jamie Raskin isn't mincing words: the Justice Department's handling of the Epstein files looks less like transparency and more like a cover-up.

Raskin told reporters he had just returned from a bleak DOJ satellite office - "four computers in the room" - where Judiciary Committee members are being forced to review supposedly "released" Epstein documents under tight constraints. Congress went there for one reason: to make sure the Epstein Files Transparency Act was honored, victims protected, and perpetrators exposed.

What he found was the opposite.

"There are hundreds and hundreds of pages where identifying information about victims is right there, including people's names," Raskin said, calling it a "dramatic departure" from the law's most emphatic requirement. Survivors' privacy, he warned, has been compromised-either through "spectacular incompetence and sloppiness" or, as survivors fear, a deliberate warning to others thinking about coming forward.

At the same time, Raskin said the files are riddled with mysterious redactions shielding people who are clearly not victims. Names of "co-conspirators, accomplices, enablers, abusers, rapists" appear to have been blacked out simply to avoid "embarrassment, political sensitivity, or disgrace."

When pressed, Raskin gave a striking example: Les Wexner-a public figure whose name has appeared elsewhere-was inexplicably redacted. Even more troubling, Raskin described an email chain involving Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell that summarized conversations between Epstein's lawyers and Donald Trump's lawyers during the 2009 investigation. That passage-reporting Trump said Epstein was a guest at Mar-a-Lago and was never asked to leave-was redacted "for some indeterminate, inscrutable reason," Raskin said, noting it appears to contradict Trump's public claims.

Raskin emphasized the scale of the problem: DOJ has released 3.5 million documents while withholding 3 million more. Members have reviewed only a handful. "There is no way" Congress can vet these redactions before Attorney General testimony, he said-especially with just four computers.

His conclusion was blunt: "I think the Department of Justice has been in a cover-up mode for many months." The path forward, Raskin argued, runs through the survivors-public hearings, full release of the files, and only one kind of redaction: the names of victims.

Anything else, he warned, deepens the nightmare.

Please like and share to spread the news!